LR EH62 and LR EH69 are ultra-high-strength shipbuilding steel plates certified by Lloyd's Register (LR), representing the premium tier of the "EH" (Extra High-strength, High toughness) series. These grades are specifically engineered for the most critical and highly stressed structures in modern shipbuilding, such as the hatch coamings, sheer strakes, and upper deck longitudinals of ultra-large container vessels (ULCVs), as well as heavy-lift ships and Arctic-class offshore units. Their application is driven by the need to maximize structural efficiency and payload capacity while ensuring unparalleled safety through exceptional low-temperature toughness.
Key Differences:
The defining difference is their mechanical strength. LR EH62 has a minimum yield strength of 460 MPa (with a corresponding tensile strength of 620 MPa). LR EH69 specifies an even higher minimum yield strength of 500 MPa (with a tensile strength of 690 MPa), making it one of the strongest grades available for commercial maritime applications. This superior strength allows for further weight reduction or the design of structures capable of withstanding extreme loads.
Achieving this strength increment requires an advanced metallurgical approach. EH69 possesses a significantly higher alloy content, particularly of micro-alloying elements like Niobium, Vanadium, Titanium, and often Nickel, processed under stringent thermo-mechanical controlled processing (TMCP) or quenching and tempering (Q&T). This results in a notably higher carbon equivalent (Ceq) and crack susceptibility index (Pcm) compared to EH62. Consequently, the fabrication of EH69, especially welding, is substantially more challenging and restrictive. It demands extremely precise procedures: the use of specially matched, ultra-low-hydrogen welding consumables, meticulous control of preheating (often above 100°C) and interpass temperatures, strict limits on heat input, and frequently mandatory post-weld heat treatment (PWHT). The selection of EH69 over EH62 represents a commitment to ultimate material performance, which must be justified against its significantly higher material cost and the stringent, costly welding engineering required for safe implementation.
Chemical Composition
LR EH62 extra high Strength Chemical Composition | |||||||
Grade | The Element Max (%) | ||||||
C | Si | Mn | P | S | Al | N | |
LR EH62 | 0.20 | 0.55 | 1.70 | 0.030 | 0.030 | 0.015 | 0.020 |
Nb | V | Ti | Cu | Cr | Ni | Mo | |
0.02-0.05 | 0.03-0.10 | 0.02 |
|
|
|
| |
LR EH69 extra high Strength Chemical Composition | |||||||
Grade | The Element Max (%) | ||||||
C | Si | Mn | P | S | Al | N | |
LR EH69 | 0.20 | 0.55 | 1.70 | 0.030 | 0.030 | 0.015 | 0.020 |
Nb | V | Ti | Cu | Cr | Ni | Mo | |
0.02-0.05 | 0.03-0.10 | 0.02 |
|
|
|
| |
Mechanical Property
LR EH62 extra high strength property | |||||||
Grade |
| Mechanical Property | Charpy V Impact Test | ||||
Thickness | Yield | Tensile | Elongation | Degree | Energy 1 | Energy 2 | |
LR EH62 | mm | Min Mpa | Mpa | Min % | -40 | J | J |
t≤50 | 620 | 720-890 | 17% | 41 | 62 | ||
50<t≤70 | 620 | 720-890 | 17% | 41 | 62 | ||
70<t≤100 | 620 | 720-890 | 17% | 41 | 62 | ||
Note: Energy 1 is transverse impact test, Energy 2 is longitudinal | |||||||
LR EH69 extra high strength property | |||||||
Grade |
| Mechanical Property | Charpy V Impact Test | ||||
Thickness | Yield | Tensile | Elongation | Degree | Energy 1 | Energy 2 | |
LR EH69 | mm | Min Mpa | Mpa | Min % | -40 | J | J |
t≤50 | 690 | 770-940 | 16% | 46 | 69 | ||
50<t≤70 | 690 | 770-940 | 16% | 46 | 69 | ||
70<t≤100 | 690 | 770-940 | 16% | 46 | 69 | ||
Note: Energy 1 is transverse impact test, Energy 2 is longitudinal | |||||||





