How do high-strength steels such as CCS EH36/FH40 produced in China perform in terms of weldability and price competitiveness?

Aug 08, 2025 Leave a message

1. Welding Performance: Carbon Equivalent (CEV) and Preheat Requirements

Chinese CCS EH36/FH40 typically has higher CEV, increasing welding complexity.

CEV Comparison:

Baowu EH36: CEV ~0.38–0.42 (due to higher C/Mn content).

POSCO EH36: CEV ~0.34–0.38 (leaner chemistry with microalloying).

Preheat Impact:

Chinese EH36 often requires 100–125°C preheat (vs. 75–100°C for Korean EH36).

Case Study: COSCO reports 10–15% longer welding times for Baowu EH36 vs. POSCO.

Crack Sensitivity:

Higher Pcm (cracking index) in Chinese steels (0.22–0.25 vs. 0.18–0.21 for JFE).

Result: More hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) risks, demanding stricter electrode controls.


2. Price Competitiveness: Cost Advantages with Trade-offs

Chinese CCS steels are 15–25% cheaper but face export barriers.

Price Comparison (FOB, 2024):

Baowu CCS EH36: $600–650/ton.

POSCO ABS EH36: $750–800/ton.

JFE DNV EH36: $800–850/ton.

Cost Drivers:

Lower Ni/Cr alloying in Chinese steels reduces material costs.

Chinese domestic subsidies (e.g., tax breaks for state-owned mills).

Trade Barriers:

EU anti-dumping duties (25%) negate price advantages in Europe.

Dual certification (CCS+ABS) adds $50–100/ton for exports.

Market Reality: BRI and domestic Chinese ships prioritize Baowu/Ansteel; global fleets prefer POSCO/JFE.


3. Weld Consumables and Fabrication Efficiency

Chinese steels demand specialized electrodes, raising fabrication costs.

Consumable Compatibility:

Baowu EH36 often requires AWS E81T1-Ni2 (vs. standard E71T-1 for POSCO).

Cost Impact: Ni-based wires are 20–30% pricier.

Automated Welding Suitability:

Korean EH36 performs better in robotized FCAW due to lower spatter.

Chinese mills are improving TMCP consistency to reduce weld defects.

Shipyard Feedback:

Samsung Heavy Industries reports 5–8% higher NDT failure rates with CCS FH40 vs. POSCO.

Solution: Some Chinese yards pre-test plates with matched filler metals.


4. International Certification and Quality Perception

ABS/DNV approvals for Chinese EH36/FH40 lag behind Japanese/Korean steels.

Certification Hurdles:

Baowu's ABS EH36 requires extra impact tests (-40°C transverse).

DNV GL rarely certifies Ansteel FH40 for LNG carriers without supplemental data.

Quality Reputation:

POSCO's "Zero Defect" EH36 is preferred for critical zones (e.g., hatch coamings).

Chinese mills improve, but skepticism persists in EU/US markets.

Case Example:

Maersk's newbuilds use dual-sourced EH36 (POSCO hull + Baowu bulkheads).

Trend: Baowu invests in AI-based quality control to match JFE's reliability.


5. Future Outlook: Upgrades and Green Steel Race

Chinese mills are closing the gap via R&D and sustainability initiatives.

TMCP Advancements:

Baowu's new EH36 batch achieves CEV 0.36 (closer to POSCO's 0.34).

Target: Reduce preheat to 80°C by 2025.

Green Steel Push:

Baowu's hydrogen-based DRI EH36 (1.8t CO₂/ton) competes with POSCO's Hyundai EAF routes.

CCS plans low-carbon steel notation to align with EU ETS.

Export Strategies:

Dual-certified (CCS+ABS) EH36 for Southeast Asian shipbuilders.

Price undercutting in Africa/Latin America.